Johnson, Bob (2017) The Scientific Evidence That “Intent” Is Vital for Healthcare. Open Journal of Philosophy, 07 (04). pp. 422-434. ISSN 2163-9434
OJPP_2017091514504803.pdf - Published Version
Download (341kB)
Abstract
THINKING cannot occur without electrons, a point philosophically, scientifically and irrefutably confirmed for all, by the Electroencephalogram (EEG). However for 100 years, electrons and their ilk have scrupulously obeyed the Uncertainty Principle. Probability rules. The way human beings reason is by concluding that if event B is seen to follow cause A, it will do so again tomorrow—electrons don’t even support this today. Hume’s critique of causality which Kant failed to refute, gains traction from Quantum Mechanics. Despite needing to insert the word “probably” into every human reasoning, healthcare demonstrates an element of unexpected stability. The label “intent” is expanded to cover this anomaly, endeavouring to highlight how living cells cope with the impact of this unknowability, this Uncertainty. Mental health follows suit, though here the uncertainty comes additionally from “blockage” of the frontal lobes consequent upon trauma/terror. The collapse of today’s psychiatry is pathognomonic, and medically solipsistic. The role of “intent”, and its close relative, consent, are offered as remedies, not only for mental disease, relabelled here “social defeat”, but also for the global disease of violence, culminating in the biggest health threat of them all, thermonuclear war.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | Digital Open Archives > Social Sciences and Humanities |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email support@digiopenarchives.com |
Date Deposited: | 04 Jul 2023 05:04 |
Last Modified: | 24 Jul 2024 09:31 |
URI: | http://geographical.openuniversityarchive.com/id/eprint/1609 |