Evaluating the Agreement between the Twin-Block Appliance and a New Low-Cost Arch Development Appliance in Changing the Mandibular Length

Jayathilake, A. M. Imanthi C. K. and Nawarathna, Lakshika S. and Nagarathne, S. P. N. P. (2020) Evaluating the Agreement between the Twin-Block Appliance and a New Low-Cost Arch Development Appliance in Changing the Mandibular Length. Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 10 (1). pp. 13-24. ISSN 2582-0230

[thumbnail of Nawarathna1012020AJPAS63022.pdf] Text
Nawarathna1012020AJPAS63022.pdf - Published Version

Download (924kB)

Abstract

Aim: The main objective of this study is to compare the development of mandibular length by comparing the effectiveness of a new low-cost arch development appliance in increasing the length of the mandible with the twin block appliance (Twin-B).

Methodology: This analysis was performed on patients who attended the clinic in the Division of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, University of Peradeniya. The sample included 60 subjects treated with Twin-B (n=30) and new low-cost arch development (n=30) appliances and each appliance comprised 15 males and females. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) were calculated to check the agreement between the two methods. A mixed-effects model was fitted to predict mandibular length, and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), and log-likelihood were used for selecting the best model.

Results: It was observed that the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) for after treatment as 0.9172 with a (0.8488, 0.9555) 95% confidence interval. Furthermore, it gives a Pearson correlation of 0.9609 and bias correlation factor of 0.9545. ICC values after treatment for both single measures and average measures are 0.9499 and 0.9743 with the 95% confidence intervals (0.8976, 0.9758) and (0.9460, 0.9878) respectively.

Conclusion: Besides, both Twin-B and new low-cost arch development appliances have a better agreement and can be used interchangeably. Therefore, the new low-cost arch development appliance is more suitable as a treatment for malocclusion for Sri Lankan patients as it is less expensive, simpler and, less invasive.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Digital Open Archives > Mathematical Science
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email support@digiopenarchives.com
Date Deposited: 16 Mar 2023 11:17
Last Modified: 01 Aug 2024 08:47
URI: http://geographical.openuniversityarchive.com/id/eprint/640

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item